Market Loss Assistance Program in Illinois, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 143,552
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Illinois totaled $1,543,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Ivers Bros | Saint Francisville, IL 62460 | $219,760 |
62 | Flikkema Farms | Lanark, IL 61046 | $218,332 |
63 | T O Logsdon Farms Partnership | Shawneetown, IL 62984 | $217,300 |
64 | Scott H & Lois L Burkhart | Winnebago, IL 61088 | $216,868 |
65 | Anke Group Partnership | Altona, IL 61414 | $214,671 |
66 | Church & Stout Farms | Prophetstown, IL 61277 | $214,356 |
67 | Funk's Farms | Elkville, IL 62932 | $213,786 |
68 | R D J Thomas Farms | Mc Leansboro, IL 62859 | $213,369 |
69 | Pifer Farms | Palestine, IL 62451 | $213,274 |
70 | White Sands Farms | Saint Anne, IL 60964 | $211,052 |
71 | J Willrett Farms | Malta, IL 60150 | $210,385 |
72 | Blair Farms Fp LLC | Winslow, IL 61089 | $210,227 |
73 | M F O | Waverly, KY 42462 | $210,056 |
74 | Follman Farms | Hampshire, IL 60140 | $208,804 |
75 | Ohl Brothers Partnership | Danville, IL 61834 | $204,248 |
76 | Frantz Farms | Cherry Valley, IL 61016 | $204,222 |
77 | Jarden Farms | Bunker Hill, IL 62014 | $202,488 |
78 | Fink Tom And Lisa Joint Venture | Chadwick, IL 61014 | $202,278 |
79 | Gene R & Mary J Lane | Kirkland, IL 60146 | $201,528 |
80 | Thomas Ron Larry Dowson | Auburn, IL 62615 | $201,472 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”