Farm Subsidy information
Illinois
Total Subsidies in Illinois, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 322,867
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Illinois totaled $34,712,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | M F O | Waverly, KY 42462 | $3,445,888 |
82 | Baumgart Farms | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $3,434,628 |
83 | Colwell Farms | Franklin Grove, IL 61031 | $3,428,559 |
84 | Deyoung Farms | Saint Anne, IL 60964 | $3,368,494 |
85 | Steven Dean Harre | Nashville, IL 62263 | $3,360,186 |
86 | White Sands Farms | Saint Anne, IL 60964 | $3,351,046 |
87 | C & G Farms Inc | Richview, IL 62877 | $3,345,204 |
88 | Fleming Farms | Lee, IL 60530 | $3,337,975 |
89 | Larson Farms Partnership | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $3,291,992 |
90 | Biddle Brothers | Elburn, IL 60119 | $3,287,105 |
91 | Sanden Partners | Wyanet, IL 61379 | $3,282,559 |
92 | Mark And Rose Shedd | Rockton, IL 61072 | $3,268,386 |
93 | Stoecker Farms Inc | Litchfield, IL 62056 | $3,262,481 |
94 | Waeltz Bros | Marissa, IL 62257 | $3,257,064 |
95 | Browns Forest Home Farms Inc | Aledo, IL 61231 | $3,245,577 |
96 | Cowser Field & Feedlot | Bradford, IL 61421 | $3,245,492 |
97 | A S & K Farms | Enfield, IL 62835 | $3,224,393 |
98 | Stewart Farms Partnership | Yorkville, IL 60560 | $3,205,114 |
99 | Rinderer Farms Partnership | Trenton, IL 62293 | $3,204,011 |
100 | L & B Bols Farms | Minooka, IL 60447 | $3,191,087 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”