Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Illinois, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 87,149
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Illinois totaled $2,582,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Shriver Operating Partnership | Ursa, IL 62376 | $568,931 |
82 | Boarman Brothers Partnership | Pawnee, IL 62558 | $567,076 |
83 | Shady Lawn | Ridgway, IL 62979 | $566,912 |
84 | Five Bar Farms | Wayne City, IL 62895 | $560,465 |
85 | Mclaughlin/dooley Farms | Le Roy, IL 61752 | $558,484 |
86 | First Midwest Bank ** | Yorkville, IL 60560 | $555,671 |
87 | Reum Bros | Gibson City, IL 60936 | $551,109 |
88 | Bomke Farms | Pleasant Plains, IL 62677 | $549,942 |
89 | Lorenzen Farms Ptrp | Chrisman, IL 61924 | $547,918 |
90 | Waeltz Bros | Marissa, IL 62257 | $543,665 |
91 | Keith Moore - Moore Farms Partnership | Sumner, IL 62466 | $541,884 |
92 | High Plains Pork Inc | Winslow, IL 61089 | $539,930 |
93 | Hunt Farms Partnership | Mazon, IL 60444 | $535,708 |
94 | Bickett Brothers Farms | Shawneetown, IL 62984 | $534,843 |
95 | Crane Farms | Forrest, IL 61741 | $528,454 |
96 | Burgener Pork Inc | Moweaqua, IL 62550 | $527,683 |
97 | Stoecker Farms Inc | Litchfield, IL 62056 | $527,320 |
98 | Double L Farms Inc | Forrest, IL 61741 | $526,953 |
99 | Farmers National Bank ** | Prophetstown, IL 61277 | $524,379 |
100 | Double D Farms Ptr | Noble, IL 62868 | $521,806 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”