Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Illinois, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 7,954
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Illinois totaled $15,021,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Herrmann Farms | Hinckley, IL 60520 | $123,516 |
2 | Heritage Family Farms | Arthur, IL 61911 | $122,148 |
3 | Holmes Farms Gp | New Holland, IL 62671 | $97,080 |
4 | Ratermann Bros | Bartelso, IL 62218 | $93,312 |
5 | Gingerich Farms | Lovington, IL 61937 | $92,895 |
6 | Frontier Farms | De Land, IL 61839 | $88,486 |
7 | Kjmm Partnership | New Athens, IL 62264 | $72,401 |
8 | Dunteman Ag Partners | Kaneville, IL 60144 | $70,001 |
9 | Kieser Farms Partnership | Mc Lean, IL 61754 | $60,853 |
10 | Donald E Bunting | Metropolis, IL 62960 | $51,763 |
11 | Rogers Brothers | Stockton, IL 61085 | $46,271 |
12 | Mtc Land & Livestock Inc | Carthage, IL 62321 | $45,557 |
13 | Sis-bro Inc | New Athens, IL 62264 | $45,066 |
14 | Block Farms | Dunn Loring, VA 22027 | $42,436 |
15 | Pitstick Pork Inc | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $41,055 |
16 | Michel Partnership | Edinburg, IL 62531 | $40,495 |
17 | Jo-eng Dairy Farms Inc | German Valley, IL 61039 | $39,698 |
18 | Steve And Dana Waggoner Partnership | Salem, IL 62881 | $35,081 |
19 | Reum Bros | Gibson City, IL 60936 | $34,663 |
20 | Bedeker Farms | Seneca, IL 61360 | $34,633 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>