Deficiency Payment in Brown County, Illinois, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 512
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Brown County, Illinois totaled $1,222,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | H Dwain Smith | Mount Sterling, IL 62353 | $13,405 |
22 | Richard Eugene Ingram | Mount Sterling, IL 62353 | $13,267 |
23 | Alan Koch & Glen Koch Farms | Mount Sterling, IL 62353 | $13,068 |
24 | Charles L Wessel | Trivoli, IL 61569 | $12,148 |
25 | Donald Colclasure | Clayton, IL 62324 | $12,053 |
26 | Joseph F Veith | Mount Sterling, IL 62353 | $10,804 |
27 | Kurfman Farms Inc | Baylis, IL 62314 | $10,578 |
28 | John F Regan | Decatur, IL 62523 | $10,148 |
29 | Mary L Cummings Estate | Pittsfield, IL 62363 | $9,896 |
30 | Ken Kerr | Mount Sterling, IL 62353 | $9,819 |
31 | Andrew A Newton | Mount Sterling, IL 62353 | $9,594 |
32 | Dennis Ray Houston | Mount Sterling, IL 62353 | $9,369 |
33 | Mark Christy Roberts | Timewell, IL 62375 | $8,450 |
34 | G Chris Roberts | Timewell, IL 62375 | $8,450 |
35 | Richard F Alsup | Versailles, IL 62378 | $8,401 |
36 | Charlotte D Markert | Mount Sterling, IL 62353 | $8,033 |
37 | Charles Earnest Buxton Jr | Mount Sterling, IL 62353 | $7,988 |
38 | Lloyd Agans | Versailles, IL 62378 | $7,883 |
39 | Charles H Hamilton | Versailles, IL 62378 | $7,721 |
40 | Terry D Johnson | Mount Sterling, IL 62353 | $7,499 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”