Production Flexibility Program in Clark County, Illinois, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,250
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Clark County, Illinois totaled $25,391,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Schiver & Sons Hog Farm | Martinsville, IL 62442 | $318,638 |
2 | Macke Farms | West Union, IL 62477 | $302,668 |
3 | Dale Leroy Huisinga | Casey, IL 62420 | $292,699 |
4 | Gerald R Forsythe | Marshall, IL 62441 | $288,451 |
5 | Herbert Bradley Huisinga | Casey, IL 62420 | $281,989 |
6 | Dale Leroy Huisinga Jr | Casey, IL 62420 | $275,035 |
7 | Welsh Ag Enterprises | Marshall, IL 62441 | $262,995 |
8 | Triple M Farms | Marshall, IL 62441 | $250,594 |
9 | Gary Alan Tingley | Martinsville, IL 62442 | $210,806 |
10 | Forsythe Family Farms Inc | Marshall, IL 62441 | $209,950 |
11 | Randal Eugene Lindley | West Union, IL 62477 | $201,328 |
12 | Michael Gene Huffington | West Union, IL 62477 | $201,266 |
13 | Welsh Bros | Marshall, IL 62441 | $185,265 |
14 | Cline Farms | Marshall, IL 62441 | $182,964 |
15 | Ronald Everett Hawkins | Casey, IL 62420 | $167,557 |
16 | Lee - Lee R Ryan Tru Ray Ryan | Casey, IL 62420 | $155,503 |
17 | Leon Hupp | Westfield, IL 62474 | $154,022 |
18 | J Williams Farms Inc | West Union, IL 62477 | $141,975 |
19 | Norman P Yeley | Marshall, IL 62441 | $136,883 |
20 | Kenneth Wells & Sons Inc | West Union, IL 62477 | $131,466 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>