Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Clay County, Illinois, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 153
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Clay County, Illinois totaled $2,733,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Justin Lloyd Schaal | Farina, IL 62838 | $2,608 |
82 | Robert Wayne Harris | Clay City, IL 62824 | $2,567 |
83 | Russell E Patridge | Danville, CA 94506 | $2,483 |
84 | Frances A Kapp | O Fallon, IL 62269 | $2,400 |
85 | William H Fritchley Sr Revocable Living Trust | Pittsboro, IN 46167 | $2,283 |
86 | Lola Tobiason | Blue Springs, MO 64015 | $2,220 |
87 | Lee Randall Lewis | Rinard, IL 62878 | $2,213 |
88 | Cole A Weidner | Clay City, IL 62824 | $2,151 |
89 | George M Harris | Mount Olive, IL 62069 | $2,025 |
90 | Linda C Davidson | Sailor Springs, IL 62879 | $2,019 |
91 | Beulah M Keck | Cisne, IL 62823 | $1,888 |
92 | Edward E Harms | Lincolnshire, IL 60069 | $1,821 |
93 | Gerald Gould | Louisville, IL 62858 | $1,714 |
94 | Ray S Cammon | El Paso, TX 79924 | $1,683 |
95 | Hugh D Kessler | Clay City, IL 62824 | $1,652 |
96 | Bernice M Traub | Dieterich, IL 62424 | $1,547 |
97 | Charles Aj Warren | Flora, IL 62839 | $1,468 |
98 | Gary E Keck | Carmi, IL 62821 | $1,465 |
99 | Thurl Burton Jr | Dieterich, IL 62424 | $1,394 |
100 | Carl Roger Stanley | Effingham, IL 62401 | $1,297 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”