Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Clay County, Illinois, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 153
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Clay County, Illinois totaled $2,733,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Nyal W Dickey | Flora, IL 62839 | $18,480 |
42 | Roger D Fatheree | Xenia, IL 62899 | $16,665 |
43 | Dwight Edgington | Xenia, IL 62899 | $15,154 |
44 | Paige Earleywine | Flora, IL 62839 | $14,744 |
45 | Loren Dunigan | Clay City, IL 62824 | $14,668 |
46 | Lash Farming Inc | Farina, IL 62838 | $13,724 |
47 | Douglas Lee Krutsinger | Xenia, IL 62899 | $13,533 |
48 | Kenneth M Weiler | Claremont, IL 62421 | $12,908 |
49 | Steven E Weiler | Claremont, IL 62421 | $12,908 |
50 | Edward Lee Lewis | Louisville, IL 62858 | $11,161 |
51 | Chas C Smith | Reno, NV 89503 | $10,449 |
52 | Darrin S Hout | Flora, IL 62839 | $9,999 |
53 | M D Harmon | Xenia, IL 62899 | $9,885 |
54 | Miles Daniel Warren | Clay City, IL 62824 | $9,576 |
55 | Phillip A Hardin | Louisville, IL 62858 | $9,084 |
56 | Aaron L Hardin | Louisville, IL 62858 | $9,084 |
57 | Carrol Lee Frutiger | Clay City, IL 62824 | $8,180 |
58 | Neal Warren Trust | Clay City, IL 62824 | $8,121 |
59 | Travis Alan Cooper | Xenia, IL 62899 | $7,090 |
60 | Neal Warren Trust Invaild | Clay City, IL 62824 | $6,811 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”