Conservation Reserve Program in Clinton County, Illinois, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 414
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Clinton County, Illinois totaled $712,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Dolores C Gerdes Irrev Real Estate Trust | Bartelso, IL 62218 | $1,796 |
122 | Donald L Beckemeyer | Carlyle, IL 62231 | $1,778 |
123 | Dwayne E Edler | Centralia, IL 62801 | $1,777 |
124 | Ralph Koerkenmeier | Albers, IL 62215 | $1,767 |
125 | Kerry J Jansen | Carlyle, IL 62231 | $1,750 |
126 | William R Parkin Jr | Aviston, IL 62216 | $1,740 |
127 | Douglas W Dorries Family Trust | Centralia, IL 62801 | $1,720 |
128 | Dennis A Frohn | Carlyle, IL 62231 | $1,710 |
129 | David Grapperhaus | Bartelso, IL 62218 | $1,708 |
130 | Steve P Peters | Breese, IL 62230 | $1,698 |
131 | Heckenkemper Family Irrv Tr No 300 | New Baden, IL 62265 | $1,665 |
132 | Daniel J Rakers | Breese, IL 62230 | $1,595 |
133 | Cmc Farms LLC | Carlyle, IL 62231 | $1,593 |
134 | Stanley Eversgerd | Bartelso, IL 62218 | $1,589 |
135 | James A Hellmann Tr No 101 | Littleton, CO 80123 | $1,570 |
136 | Shirley M Hellmann Tr No 102 | Littleton, CO 80123 | $1,570 |
137 | Roy David Nolte | Shattuc, IL 62231 | $1,553 |
138 | Dolores Tyberendt | Shattuc, IL 62231 | $1,549 |
139 | Donald Draves | Centralia, IL 62801 | $1,548 |
140 | Nicholas Lee Pingsterhaus | Breese, IL 62230 | $1,523 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”