Conservation Reserve Program in Coles County, Illinois, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 539
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Coles County, Illinois totaled $1,476,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Kc Newby Farms Inc | Humboldt, IL 61931 | $4,510 |
82 | Jim Thompson | Charleston, IL 61920 | $4,484 |
83 | Ronald A Ralston | Charleston, IL 61920 | $4,275 |
84 | Bruce Sloat Trust Dated January 2 | Ashmore, IL 61912 | $4,246 |
85 | Bond Farms Inc | Mattoon, IL 61938 | $4,190 |
86 | Jonathan E Graham | Noblesville, IN 46062 | $4,186 |
87 | Kenneth Hostetler | Arcola, IL 61910 | $4,133 |
88 | Eugene A Goe | Santa Barbara, CA 93101 | $4,104 |
89 | John Gossett | Charleston, IL 61920 | $4,073 |
90 | Gary R Morris | Mattoon, IL 61938 | $4,023 |
91 | Nathaniel B Ralston | Greenup, IL 62428 | $3,963 |
92 | Larry Newby | Charleston, IL 61920 | $3,952 |
93 | David Taylor | Oakland, IL 61943 | $3,928 |
94 | River Top LLC | Tuscola, IL 61953 | $3,889 |
95 | Gale Bolin | Humboldt, IL 61931 | $3,871 |
96 | Brian A Ellermets | Mattoon, IL 61938 | $3,820 |
97 | J Thomas Donnell | Humboldt, IL 61931 | $3,799 |
98 | Graves Farms LLC | Charleston, IL 61920 | $3,742 |
99 | James Robert Eiftmann | Saint Joseph, IL 61873 | $3,736 |
100 | Dixie L Gough | Kansas, IL 61933 | $3,726 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”