Conservation Reserve Program in DeKalb County, Illinois, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 463
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in DeKalb County, Illinois totaled $1,672,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Anne Laketa Trust No 102 | Lemont, IL 60439 | $4,253 |
122 | Peter Laketa Sr Tr 101 | Lemont, IL 60439 | $4,253 |
123 | Charlie Harris | Hinckley, IL 60520 | $4,236 |
124 | , | $4,230 | |
125 | Montgomery Trust No Jrm-1 | Kingston, IL 60145 | $4,228 |
126 | David Laketa | Crest Hill, IL 60403 | $4,174 |
127 | , | $4,128 | |
128 | Daniel D Hoffman | Kingston, IL 60145 | $4,084 |
129 | Sauber Farms Partnership | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $4,080 |
130 | Tim Schramer | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $3,990 |
131 | Larry Driscoll | Kirkland, IL 60146 | $3,979 |
132 | R&j Nelson Farms LLC | Genoa, IL 60135 | $3,972 |
133 | Peter Laketa Jr | Gig Harbor, WA 98335 | $3,951 |
134 | Edward D Sutoris Trust | Chicago, IL 60646 | $3,921 |
135 | , | $3,836 | |
136 | James R Boesche | Dekalb, IL 60115 | $3,818 |
137 | Scott A Drake | Dekalb, IL 60115 | $3,770 |
138 | Kathy Stelford | Sycamore, IL 60178 | $3,747 |
139 | Jerald M Hipple Trust No 101 | Waterman, IL 60556 | $3,718 |
140 | W Alfred Parcell Declaration Of Trust | Evanston, IL 60201 | $3,664 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”