Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in DeKalb County, Illinois, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 71
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in DeKalb County, Illinois totaled $82,236 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | James Stuntz | Kirkland, IL 60146 | $465 |
22 | Robert Lee Mende Trust | Kirkland, IL 60146 | $450 |
23 | Donald K Frieders | Waterman, IL 60556 | $325 |
24 | Jones Farm Partnership | Kirkland, IL 60146 | $278 |
25 | Christopher J Paulsen | Clare, IL 60111 | $278 |
26 | Dennis Nickels Jr | Sugar Grove, IL 60554 | $274 |
27 | Bill Deutsch | Sycamore, IL 60178 | $236 |
28 | Patrick Deutsch | Sycamore, IL 60178 | $236 |
29 | Rodney R Challand | Sycamore, IL 60178 | $230 |
30 | Morris Harvell II | Steward, IL 60553 | $211 |
31 | Raymond Fox | Sandwich, IL 60548 | $198 |
32 | Clarence W Thorpe | Waterman, IL 60556 | $195 |
33 | Roger Thorpe | Dekalb, IL 60115 | $195 |
34 | Don Halverson | Dekalb, IL 60115 | $194 |
35 | Mike Blackwood | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $187 |
36 | David Halverson | Dekalb, IL 60115 | $170 |
37 | Shepherd Industries Pension Plan | Kirkland, IL 60146 | $158 |
38 | Timothy Frieders | Varna, IL 61375 | $155 |
39 | Michael J Pitstick | Kaneville, IL 60144 | $153 |
40 | Melissa S Theisen | Kaneville, IL 60144 | $153 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”