Farm Subsidy information
De Witt County, Illinois
Total Subsidies in De Witt County, Illinois, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 821
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in De Witt County, Illinois totaled $8,331,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | R Dennis Koberlein | Mc Lean, IL 61754 | $15,125 |
82 | Ronald Ferguson | Clinton, IL 61727 | $15,086 |
83 | Daniel Wayne Reynolds | Weldon, IL 61882 | $14,689 |
84 | Robert Klemm | Waynesville, IL 61778 | $14,628 |
85 | Charles Runge | Mc Lean, IL 61754 | $14,617 |
86 | Lott H Thomas | Bloomington, IL 61702 | $14,555 |
87 | Marc Mathias | Kenney, IL 61749 | $14,284 |
88 | David Hoffman | Decatur, IL 62521 | $14,264 |
89 | Robert D Doenitz Revoc Tr | Wapella, IL 61777 | $14,215 |
90 | Melvin Murphy | Clinton, IL 61727 | $14,205 |
91 | John Houser | Farmer City, IL 61842 | $14,111 |
92 | Craig R Walsh | Dewitt, IL 61735 | $14,044 |
93 | Paul Armstrong | Wapella, IL 61777 | $13,961 |
94 | O'brien Family Farms Limited Partnership | Forsyth, IL 62535 | $13,846 |
95 | Reeder Family Farmland Subtrust | Springfield, IL 62711 | $13,683 |
96 | Matthew Cooper | Wapella, IL 61777 | $13,656 |
97 | Russell A Hirschman | Farmer City, IL 61842 | $13,419 |
98 | Walter L Morrow Qualified Disclaimer Trust | Clinton, IL 61727 | $13,389 |
99 | Daniel C Mills | Clinton, IL 61727 | $13,380 |
100 | Collin Reeser | Champaign, IL 61821 | $13,214 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”