Farm Subsidy information
De Witt County, Illinois
Total Subsidies in De Witt County, Illinois, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 821
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in De Witt County, Illinois totaled $8,331,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Arthur E Cooper Revoc Liv Trust | Wapella, IL 61777 | $13,068 |
102 | Nebel Bros | Decatur, IL 62523 | $12,992 |
103 | Terry Deavers | Clinton, IL 61727 | $12,817 |
104 | James O'brien | Bloomington, IL 61705 | $12,693 |
105 | Ruth Ann Peterson Trust | Kenney, IL 61749 | $12,689 |
106 | Thomas Hieronymus | Farmer City, IL 61842 | $12,659 |
107 | Nathan Hieronymus | Farmer City, IL 61842 | $12,659 |
108 | Jack H Wilson | Waynesville, IL 61778 | $12,631 |
109 | Timothy Lee Walsh | Farmer City, IL 61842 | $12,620 |
110 | Lindon Riddle | Clinton, IL 61727 | $12,616 |
111 | Ron Falk | Monticello, IL 61856 | $12,498 |
112 | Scott Tool | Clinton, IL 61727 | $12,436 |
113 | Robert L Holland | Mc Lean, IL 61754 | $12,404 |
114 | Terry Spencer | Dewitt, IL 61735 | $12,370 |
115 | David O'brien | Le Roy, IL 61752 | $12,356 |
116 | Joseph D Cunningham Estate | Lincoln, IL 62656 | $12,316 |
117 | David Plunk | Mansfield, IL 61854 | $12,208 |
118 | Robert E Johnson | Atlanta, IL 61723 | $11,982 |
119 | Philip Michael Reynolds | Clinton, IL 61727 | $11,973 |
120 | Roger Wantland | Clinton, IL 61727 | $11,928 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”