Production Flexibility Program in De Witt County, Illinois, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 1,821
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in De Witt County, Illinois totaled $26,573,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | John David Vance | Farmer City, IL 61842 | $60,057 |
102 | Robert J Thomas | Clinton, IL 61727 | $59,929 |
103 | Roger Joseph Peterson | Kenney, IL 61749 | $59,011 |
104 | Art Trimble & Son Inc | Farmer City, IL 61842 | $59,008 |
105 | Roger Twist | Farmer City, IL 61842 | $58,481 |
106 | Thomas Powers | Wapella, IL 61777 | $57,446 |
107 | Francis Powers | Wapella, IL 61777 | $57,394 |
108 | Mike Mathias | Kenney, IL 61749 | $57,285 |
109 | Larry Cunningham | Maroa, IL 61756 | $57,073 |
110 | Kenneth Baker | Farmer City, IL 61842 | $57,051 |
111 | Roger Wantland | Clinton, IL 61727 | $56,991 |
112 | B & H Farms Inc. | Wapella, IL 61777 | $56,680 |
113 | Jeff Thrasher | Clinton, IL 61727 | $56,429 |
114 | Robert D Haas | Clinton, IL 61727 | $56,396 |
115 | Lindon Riddle | Clinton, IL 61727 | $56,005 |
116 | James Lewis Mollet | Clinton, IL 61727 | $55,621 |
117 | Sessions Brothers | Farmer City, IL 61842 | $55,563 |
118 | Gerald Ryan | Vestavia Hills, AL 35216 | $55,240 |
119 | Andrews Residuary Trust | Bloomington, IL 61702 | $54,775 |
120 | Gene Blue | Clinton, IL 61727 | $54,575 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”