Conservation Reserve Program in De Witt County, Illinois, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 311
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in De Witt County, Illinois totaled $1,261,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | 4 Illini Farms Inc | Beason, IL 62512 | $1,478 |
162 | Ivan R Fink | Sherman, IL 62684 | $1,470 |
163 | Bernard Bols | Minooka, IL 60447 | $1,441 |
164 | Deborah Bols | Minooka, IL 60447 | $1,441 |
165 | Laurel Finegan | Bloomington, IL 61701 | $1,432 |
166 | Melvin Murphy | Clinton, IL 61727 | $1,427 |
167 | Mike Holtz | Champaign, IL 61821 | $1,420 |
168 | Philip West Trust Dated January 31,2012 | Farmer City, IL 61842 | $1,324 |
169 | Sylvia J Courtright | Channahon, IL 60410 | $1,307 |
170 | Marilyn Batton Trust | Spring Valley, CA 91978 | $1,262 |
171 | Darvin R Robinson | Beason, IL 62512 | $1,256 |
172 | Prather Family Trust | Clinton, IL 61727 | $1,254 |
173 | Sharon O'halloran | Delray Beach, FL 33484 | $1,246 |
174 | Brent W Powers | Altoona, KS 66710 | $1,209 |
175 | Gay A Adams | Prairieville, LA 70769 | $1,209 |
176 | Jeffrey Insana | Mahomet, IL 61853 | $1,190 |
177 | Brett W Rutledge | Hartland, WI 53029 | $1,180 |
178 | Martina Gustafson | Clinton, IL 61727 | $1,150 |
179 | James W Hankins | Shiner, TX 77984 | $1,138 |
180 | Donald Tim Reeser | Clinton, IL 61727 | $1,128 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”