Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Douglas County, Illinois, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 95
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Douglas County, Illinois totaled $330,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Jennings Hilgenberg Partnership | Arthur, IL 61911 | $3,022 |
42 | Cary Leerkamp | Sidney, IL 61877 | $2,813 |
43 | Prairie Ridge Farms Inc | Allerton, IL 61810 | $2,592 |
44 | Wilbur Pflum | Tuscola, IL 61953 | $2,582 |
45 | Mary Ann Carmack | Menlo Park, CA 94025 | $2,510 |
46 | Nadine Ferguson | Villa Grove, IL 61956 | $2,400 |
47 | Cathy Smith | Camargo, IL 61919 | $2,352 |
48 | James R Gilmer | Villa Grove, IL 61956 | $2,304 |
49 | Wm M Young | Allerton, IL 61810 | $2,207 |
50 | Ralph Schweineke Declaration Of T | Villa Grove, IL 61956 | $2,166 |
51 | Roger Reed | Newman, IL 61942 | $2,148 |
52 | Richard Lee Dorsett | Newman, IL 61942 | $2,148 |
53 | Silver Top Enterprises | Tuscola, IL 61953 | $2,128 |
54 | Julie Hoetker | Camargo, IL 61919 | $2,100 |
55 | David Xanders | Tallahassee, FL 32312 | $2,016 |
56 | Rodney Derbyshire & Mary Ann Carmack Living Trust | Menlo Park, CA 94025 | $1,890 |
57 | J H Berry Jr | Villa Grove, IL 61956 | $1,860 |
58 | Max E Brandon | Monticello, IL 61856 | $1,687 |
59 | Ann S Hall | Eden Prairie, MN 55347 | $1,687 |
60 | Alden T Wulff | Hinsdale, IL 60521 | $1,673 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”