Farm Subsidy information
Jo Daviess County, Illinois
Total Subsidies in Jo Daviess County, Illinois, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,972
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Jo Daviess County, Illinois totaled $326,036,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Harbach Family Partnership | Warren, IL 61087 | $8,897,493 |
2 | Rogers Brothers | Stockton, IL 61085 | $4,041,789 |
3 | Offenheiser Family Farm Partnership | Elizabeth, IL 61028 | $2,126,014 |
4 | Tony Jones | Stockton, IL 61085 | $2,049,016 |
5 | John Curtiss | Stockton, IL 61085 | $2,045,938 |
6 | Gerald Gerlach | Stockton, IL 61085 | $1,792,530 |
7 | Linda Gerlach | Stockton, IL 61085 | $1,738,634 |
8 | Brinkmeier Farms Inc | Warren, IL 61087 | $1,737,461 |
9 | James Mcgivney | Apple River, IL 61001 | $1,592,739 |
10 | Dennis Redington | Galena, IL 61036 | $1,576,687 |
11 | Bonnet Farms Inc | Lena, IL 61048 | $1,390,626 |
12 | Rob R Nadig | Stockton, IL 61085 | $1,369,755 |
13 | Daylon Niemann | Warren, IL 61087 | $1,329,695 |
14 | Janis Thoren | Stockton, IL 61085 | $1,306,376 |
15 | Gayle Redington | Galena, IL 61036 | $1,302,849 |
16 | Dan Hughes | Lena, IL 61048 | $1,282,107 |
17 | Greg Thoren | Stockton, IL 61085 | $1,273,180 |
18 | Dale Ven Huizen | Stockton, IL 61085 | $1,243,166 |
19 | Jason Haas | Stockton, IL 61085 | $1,164,910 |
20 | Marcel Bourquin | Apple River, IL 61001 | $1,134,868 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>