Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Kane County, Illinois, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 287
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Kane County, Illinois totaled $2,856,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Trent Pierson | Elburn, IL 60119 | $10,568 |
82 | Bruce Krog | Elgin, IL 60124 | $10,328 |
83 | Daniel Long - Daniel A Long Trust | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $10,224 |
84 | James E Oconnell | Elburn, IL 60119 | $9,861 |
85 | Scott Schoger | Big Rock, IL 60511 | $9,698 |
86 | Ruth Toppel | Hampshire, IL 60140 | $9,670 |
87 | Richard A Pump Sr Trust No 1 | Hampshire, IL 60140 | $9,593 |
88 | Richard William Biddle | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $9,153 |
89 | Dale Pierson | Elburn, IL 60119 | $8,799 |
90 | Beau M Byington | Waterman, IL 60556 | $8,773 |
91 | John Michael Biddle II | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $8,741 |
92 | Marvin H Straub | Elgin, IL 60124 | $8,683 |
93 | John William Boncosky | Elgin, IL 60124 | $8,656 |
94 | Robert White Sr | Batavia, IL 60510 | $8,643 |
95 | Joseph R White | Batavia, IL 60510 | $8,643 |
96 | Lucas K Kelm | Genoa, IL 60135 | $8,565 |
97 | Richard Ehorn Jr | Hampshire, IL 60140 | $8,373 |
98 | Eldon F Gould | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $8,224 |
99 | Kenneth Edward Wolsfeld | Big Rock, IL 60511 | $8,104 |
100 | Jeffrey Laczynski | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $8,083 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”