Farm Subsidy information
Kane County, Illinois
Total Subsidies in Kane County, Illinois, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 358
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Kane County, Illinois totaled $7,844,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Russell P Grollemond | Sycamore, IL 60178 | $13,702 |
102 | Heine Farms Inc | Hampshire, IL 60140 | $13,554 |
103 | Mike Dumoulin | Hampshire, IL 60140 | $13,373 |
104 | Charles L Engel | Sycamore, IL 60178 | $13,340 |
105 | Nicholas Petit | Virgil, IL 60151 | $13,326 |
106 | Lucas K Kelm | Genoa, IL 60135 | $12,372 |
107 | Helen M Russell Living Trust | Elburn, IL 60119 | $12,282 |
108 | Skirmont Farms LLC | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $12,253 |
109 | Lorken Farms LLC | Barrington, IL 60010 | $12,132 |
110 | Gordon Gehrke | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $12,126 |
111 | Sauber Farms Partnership | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $12,000 |
112 | Richard William Biddle | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $11,597 |
113 | Jeff Bornemann | Sugar Grove, IL 60554 | $11,203 |
114 | Nu-way Tree Moving | Elgin, IL 60124 | $11,103 |
115 | Ronald F Hartmann | Elgin, IL 60124 | $11,022 |
116 | Beau M Byington | Waterman, IL 60556 | $10,925 |
117 | Richard A Pump Sr Trust No 1 | Hampshire, IL 60140 | $10,745 |
118 | Jeffrey Laczynski | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $10,686 |
119 | Trent Pierson | Elburn, IL 60119 | $10,570 |
120 | Philip S Stojan | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $10,538 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”