Counter Cyclical Program in Kane County, Illinois, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 509
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Kane County, Illinois totaled $6,935,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Don Allen Heiniger | Elgin, IL 60124 | $17,838 |
122 | Daniel - Daniel A Lo Arnold Long | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $17,807 |
123 | Dennis Ervin Long | Elburn, IL 60119 | $17,661 |
124 | James E Oconnell | Elburn, IL 60119 | $17,657 |
125 | Carol Jean Kleckner | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $17,633 |
126 | Lester Harold Kleckner Jr | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $17,633 |
127 | Charles Steininger | Sugar Grove, IL 60554 | $17,439 |
128 | Gene Feldott | Aurora, IL 60506 | $17,397 |
129 | Dale Pierson | Elburn, IL 60119 | $17,236 |
130 | Robert H Gehrke | Elgin, IL 60124 | $17,116 |
131 | Morton Henry Haffey | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $16,830 |
132 | Bruce R Nagel | Big Rock, IL 60511 | $16,711 |
133 | Robert E Konen | Sugar Grove, IL 60554 | $16,673 |
134 | Nick Hankes | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $16,540 |
135 | Timothy Kennedy | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $16,501 |
136 | Tamara Rosenwinkel | Bristol, IL 60512 | $16,260 |
137 | Michael Rosenwinkel | Bristol, IL 60512 | $16,260 |
138 | Jeff Bornemann | Sugar Grove, IL 60554 | $16,201 |
139 | Sherri Schramer | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $15,747 |
140 | John Weidner | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $15,599 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”