Farm Subsidy information
Kane County, Illinois
Total Subsidies in Kane County, Illinois, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 408
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Kane County, Illinois totaled $18,125,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Tom Nickels | Big Rock, IL 60511 | $135,660 |
22 | Jon Deraedt | Hampshire, IL 60140 | $135,548 |
23 | Heine Farms Inc | Hampshire, IL 60140 | $127,921 |
24 | Scott & Son Cattle Inc | Sugar Grove, IL 60554 | $125,509 |
25 | Ref Livestock Inc | Elburn, IL 60119 | $119,803 |
26 | Ramm Farms Inc | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $119,293 |
27 | Deraedt Seed Corp | Hampshire, IL 60140 | $115,984 |
28 | Creekside Farms LLC | Aurora, IL 60505 | $114,688 |
29 | Dennis Nickels Jr | Sugar Grove, IL 60554 | $113,887 |
30 | Dunteman Ag Partners | Kaneville, IL 60144 | $109,354 |
31 | Joseph White | Elburn, IL 60119 | $108,056 |
32 | Bradley Schramer | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $106,228 |
33 | Goebbert's Farm Inc | Pingree Grove, IL 60140 | $102,857 |
34 | Frank Hartmann | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $102,466 |
35 | Brad Scott | Sugar Grove, IL 60554 | $101,730 |
36 | Kevin A Marshall | Big Rock, IL 60511 | $100,653 |
37 | Wesley N Morris Jr | Big Rock, IL 60511 | $99,799 |
38 | Dale F Hartmann | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $95,516 |
39 | Donald Rowlett | Hampshire, IL 60140 | $93,510 |
40 | Troxel Ag Inc | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $92,879 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”