Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Kane County, Illinois, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 507
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Kane County, Illinois totaled $23,238,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Frank Hartmann | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $180,640 |
22 | Herrmann Farms | Hinckley, IL 60520 | $180,022 |
23 | Melissa S Theisen | Kaneville, IL 60144 | $179,078 |
24 | Daneire Farms II | Elburn, IL 60119 | $178,219 |
25 | Alan Gene Volpp | Hampshire, IL 60140 | $177,701 |
26 | Dunteman Farms Partnership | Sugar Grove, IL 60554 | $175,920 |
27 | Timothy A Cosman | Harvard, IL 60033 | $172,634 |
28 | Ref Livestock Inc | Elburn, IL 60119 | $172,054 |
29 | Troxel Ag Inc | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $167,228 |
30 | Michael Deutsch | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $164,764 |
31 | Mtr Farms | Waterman, IL 60556 | $160,873 |
32 | Deraedt Seed Corp | Hampshire, IL 60140 | $158,735 |
33 | Kenyon Brothers Company | South Elgin, IL 60177 | $157,284 |
34 | Bradley Schramer | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $155,300 |
35 | Wesley N Morris Jr | Big Rock, IL 60511 | $151,657 |
36 | Samuel Beiriger | Sugar Grove, IL 60554 | $151,054 |
37 | Larry A Hagemann | Davis Junction, IL 61020 | $150,199 |
38 | Donald R Young Jr | Dekalb, IL 60115 | $149,654 |
39 | Beth Elayne Young | Dekalb, IL 60115 | $149,225 |
40 | Marianne D Gorenz | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $145,442 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”