Direct Payment Program in Kane County, Illinois, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 698
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Kane County, Illinois totaled $34,390,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Vernon L Herrmann | Big Rock, IL 60511 | $270,285 |
22 | Jeffrey Warren Nesler | Genoa, IL 60135 | $269,616 |
23 | William Peter John | Princeton, IL 61356 | $269,279 |
24 | Frank John Krueger | Marengo, IL 60152 | $266,715 |
25 | Michael Deutsch | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $264,690 |
26 | Stephen F Ruh | Sugar Grove, IL 60554 | $260,770 |
27 | Robert K Farley | Sycamore, IL 60178 | $259,597 |
28 | Craig Miller | Orangeville, IL 61060 | $255,653 |
29 | Kenyon Brothers Company | South Elgin, IL 60177 | $254,855 |
30 | Kevin A Marshall | Big Rock, IL 60511 | $245,047 |
31 | Deraedt Seed Corp | Hampshire, IL 60140 | $236,428 |
32 | Alan Gene Volpp | Hampshire, IL 60140 | $235,128 |
33 | Marianne D Gorenz | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $235,054 |
34 | Gramley Farms Inc | Elburn, IL 60119 | $234,004 |
35 | Halat Grain Farms Inc | Genoa, IL 60135 | $229,024 |
36 | Kenneth J Mangers | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $221,174 |
37 | Michael J Sauber | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $216,575 |
38 | Donna L Sauber | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $216,575 |
39 | Samuel Beiriger | Sugar Grove, IL 60554 | $209,674 |
40 | Mark Anderson | Hampshire, IL 60140 | $209,613 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”