SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program in Kane County, Illinois, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 77
Recipients of SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program from farms in Kane County, Illinois totaled $3,487,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Michael J Sauber | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $69,815 |
| 22 | Donna L Sauber | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $69,812 |
| 23 | Michael Roy Dienst | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $64,124 |
| 24 | Michael Deutsch | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $63,247 |
| 25 | Bradley Schramer | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $59,965 |
| 26 | Dan Meyer | Hampshire, IL 60140 | $56,386 |
| 27 | Lester Harold Kleckner Jr | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $44,624 |
| 28 | Carol Jean Kleckner | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $44,623 |
| 29 | Michael Hagemann | Monroe Center, IL 61052 | $44,000 |
| 30 | Michael J Pitstick | Kaneville, IL 60144 | $41,782 |
| 31 | Ruth Toppel | South Elgin, IL 60177 | $41,167 |
| 32 | Marvin H Straub | Elgin, IL 60124 | $40,624 |
| 33 | Patrick Gerard Fidler | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $39,904 |
| 34 | Sherri A Deraedt | Hampshire, IL 60140 | $38,254 |
| 35 | Kent Robert Kleckner | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $37,088 |
| 36 | Tracy Ann Kleckner | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $37,084 |
| 37 | Deraedt Seed Corp | Hampshire, IL 60140 | $35,405 |
| 38 | Pitstick Pork Inc | Maple Park, IL 60151 | $31,512 |
| 39 | William M Juns | Hampshire, IL 60140 | $30,859 |
| 40 | Jerry Hammond | Aurora, IL 60507 | $29,883 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf