Counter Cyclical Program in Kankakee County, Illinois, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,845
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Kankakee County, Illinois totaled $13,856,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Hoekstra Farms | Saint Anne, IL 60964 | $61,738 |
22 | Darrell W Stauffenberg | Kankakee, IL 60901 | $59,475 |
23 | Ron's Melon Market | Saint Anne, IL 60964 | $58,834 |
24 | Phil Hoekstra & Son Inc | Saint Anne, IL 60964 | $58,588 |
25 | Tallmadge Properties LLC | Kankakee, IL 60901 | $57,761 |
26 | Cote Farms Inc | Morocco, IN 47963 | $57,335 |
27 | Mark P O'connor | Kankakee, IL 60901 | $57,192 |
28 | Martin Graf Jr | Momence, IL 60954 | $56,884 |
29 | Degroot Veg Farms | Saint Anne, IL 60964 | $56,766 |
30 | Steven D Sanders | Herscher, IL 60941 | $56,160 |
31 | Kankakee Nursery | Aroma Park, IL 60910 | $54,687 |
32 | White Sands Farms | Saint Anne, IL 60964 | $53,312 |
33 | Fick Bros | Grant Park, IL 60940 | $53,232 |
34 | William H Ohrt | Kankakee, IL 60901 | $53,018 |
35 | Roludina Farms %r Boyer | Reddick, IL 60961 | $52,544 |
36 | Bruce Matthias | Grant Park, IL 60940 | $52,072 |
37 | Mussmans Back Acres Inc | Grant Park, IL 60940 | $51,784 |
38 | Laverne L Love | Grant Park, IL 60940 | $51,420 |
39 | Kevin Wancho | Reddick, IL 60961 | $51,240 |
40 | Anthony P Langlois | Grant Park, IL 60940 | $50,971 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”