Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Livingston County, Illinois, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 485
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Livingston County, Illinois totaled $657,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jonathan Edward Barth | Flanagan, IL 61740 | $5,238 |
22 | Barbara C Highland | Bloomington, IL 61702 | $5,018 |
23 | Dna Farm | Flanagan, IL 61740 | $4,982 |
24 | Mike & Michelle Hakes Farm | Dana, IL 61321 | $4,887 |
25 | Michael Wahls | Chenoa, IL 61726 | $4,788 |
26 | Zachery Grady | Chatsworth, IL 60921 | $4,743 |
27 | Mark Peter Regis | Reddick, IL 60961 | $4,704 |
28 | Sara 'sally' Kauffman | Chenoa, IL 61726 | $4,630 |
29 | Goudy Trust | Fairbury, IL 61739 | $4,454 |
30 | Bryan D Diemer | Pontiac, IL 61764 | $4,342 |
31 | Dart Hay Service Inc | Streator, IL 61364 | $4,245 |
32 | Daniel Gschwendtner | Pontiac, IL 61764 | $4,223 |
33 | Jeanne Gerdes | Piper City, IL 60959 | $4,075 |
34 | Christopher J Frauli | Dwight, IL 60420 | $4,030 |
35 | Barbara J Benway Living Trust | Pontiac, IL 61764 | $4,026 |
36 | Colin J Francis | Chenoa, IL 61726 | $3,987 |
37 | Michael J Haberkorn | Cullom, IL 60929 | $3,959 |
38 | Jill D Rapp | Pontiac, IL 61764 | $3,923 |
39 | Joanne B Sancken | Pontiac, IL 61764 | $3,778 |
40 | Sally J Goembel | Fairbury, IL 61739 | $3,773 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”