Production Flexibility Program in Macoupin County, Illinois, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,628
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Macoupin County, Illinois totaled $39,060,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Boehm Farms | Carlinville, IL 62626 | $363,729 |
2 | Killam Farms Inc | Carlinville, IL 62626 | $257,448 |
3 | Grothaus Farms Inc | Plainview, IL 62685 | $253,538 |
4 | Jarden Farms | Bunker Hill, IL 62014 | $249,065 |
5 | James R Launer | Modesto, IL 62667 | $248,213 |
6 | Landes Farm Inc | Palmyra, IL 62674 | $241,690 |
7 | Gary Mortimer Farms Inc | Virden, IL 62690 | $214,315 |
8 | Pleasant View Fms Inc | Carlinville, IL 62626 | $210,190 |
9 | Trojcak Farms Ltd | Girard, IL 62640 | $204,166 |
10 | Hunt Beef Farms Inc | Palmyra, IL 62674 | $200,981 |
11 | Triple T Farms Ltd | Shipman, IL 62685 | $200,679 |
12 | Rhodes Farm Inc | Carlinville, IL 62626 | $200,675 |
13 | E & K Farms Inc | Girard, IL 62640 | $185,922 |
14 | Joe Walker | Gillespie, IL 62033 | $181,776 |
15 | Schwab Farms Inc | Litchfield, IL 62056 | $178,078 |
16 | Miller Brothers Enterprises Inc | Virden, IL 62690 | $175,171 |
17 | Wonder Green Inc | Carlinville, IL 62626 | $168,197 |
18 | Gwillim Farms Ptrp | Shipman, IL 62685 | $166,408 |
19 | Mullen Inc | Litchfield, IL 62056 | $163,212 |
20 | Prose Farms Ltd | Girard, IL 62640 | $162,130 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>