Farm Subsidy information
Marshall County, Illinois
Total Subsidies in Marshall County, Illinois, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 904
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Marshall County, Illinois totaled $9,381,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | James E & Delores J Quinn Family Trust | Henry, IL 61537 | $28,395 |
42 | Eberle Enterprises Inc | Sparland, IL 61565 | $28,029 |
43 | Duane Rumbold | Chillicothe, IL 61523 | $27,910 |
44 | George E Mattern | Magnolia, IL 61336 | $27,424 |
45 | Tom J Lasswell | Washburn, IL 61570 | $27,147 |
46 | Deric Shafer | Wyoming, IL 61491 | $27,096 |
47 | Carrollyn L Hunt | Sparland, IL 61565 | $26,683 |
48 | Greg Ruestman | Wenona, IL 61377 | $26,194 |
49 | Thomas Lyle Fitschen | Washburn, IL 61570 | $26,080 |
50 | John T Timmerman | South Haven, KS 67140 | $24,947 |
51 | Bachman Enterprises | Putnam, IL 61560 | $24,843 |
52 | Beauchamp Family Ltd Partnership | Peoria, IL 61612 | $24,788 |
53 | Edward R Shimp | Sparland, IL 61565 | $24,571 |
54 | Roy - Roy A Kimble Revocable Trust | Sparland, IL 61565 | $24,533 |
55 | Randall L Salisbury | Sparland, IL 61565 | $24,469 |
56 | Craig Doyle | Henry, IL 61537 | $24,313 |
57 | Mccuskey Farms Inc | Dunlap, IL 61525 | $24,297 |
58 | Rodney Paul Prestin | Wenona, IL 61377 | $24,228 |
59 | Terry D Probyn | Sparland, IL 61565 | $23,450 |
60 | Joshua P Merdian | Henry, IL 61537 | $23,260 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”