Conservation Reserve Program in Mason County, Illinois, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 598
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Mason County, Illinois totaled $4,588,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Tim Urish | Kilbourne, IL 62655 | $26,431 |
42 | Donald E Gunterman | Easton, IL 62633 | $26,078 |
43 | Adam Shissler | Topeka, IL 61567 | $24,930 |
44 | Red Oak Tr Dtd 1-16-2004 Amended 9-2-2015 | Mahomet, IL 61853 | $24,720 |
45 | Steven S Turner | Chandlerville, IL 62627 | $24,681 |
46 | Paul John Halpin | Manito, IL 61546 | $24,661 |
47 | G Todd Hodgson | Kilbourne, IL 62655 | $24,650 |
48 | Edward A Kramer | Bath, IL 62617 | $24,546 |
49 | Arrowhead Point Inc | Beecher, IL 60401 | $23,298 |
50 | Gene Shissler & Sons Inc | Elmwood, IL 61529 | $23,294 |
51 | Debra Kitchen | Bloomington, IN 47404 | $22,444 |
52 | E Kenneth Keithley | Jacksonville, IL 62650 | $22,227 |
53 | Gary Hodgson | Kilbourne, IL 62655 | $21,914 |
54 | David R Dierker | Havana, IL 62644 | $21,761 |
55 | Blessman Farm Partnership | Manito, IL 61546 | $21,491 |
56 | Douglas Clark | Forest City, IL 61532 | $20,176 |
57 | Bonnie C Friend | Mason City, IL 62664 | $20,132 |
58 | A Ralph Kennedy Trust | Havana, IL 62644 | $20,023 |
59 | R Koert Rennecker | Kilbourne, IL 62655 | $19,875 |
60 | John Breedlove-john D Breedlove Revocable Trust | Manito, IL 61546 | $19,847 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”