Farm Subsidy information
Mason County, Illinois
Total Subsidies in Mason County, Illinois, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 954
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Mason County, Illinois totaled $14,207,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Jim W Renken | Mason City, IL 62664 | $31,353 |
82 | Don D Finch | Fort Pierce, FL 34949 | $30,549 |
83 | Dennis Rauch | San Jose, IL 62682 | $30,465 |
84 | Don Friend | Bath, IL 62617 | $30,225 |
85 | Melvin A Lascelles Jr | Easton, IL 62633 | $29,966 |
86 | Dean A Sisson | Kilbourne, IL 62655 | $29,123 |
87 | Thomas L Brownfield | Havana, IL 62644 | $29,071 |
88 | Roger C Garlisch | Mason City, IL 62664 | $28,936 |
89 | Dean R Pfeiffer | Bath, IL 62617 | $28,888 |
90 | Gary Hodgson | Kilbourne, IL 62655 | $28,779 |
91 | Peters Family Farms Gp | New Berlin, IL 62670 | $28,567 |
92 | Yosha Sottarelli Investments LLC | Lafayette, LA 70506 | $28,216 |
93 | James F Sarff Jr | Chandlerville, IL 62627 | $28,190 |
94 | Red Oak Tr Dtd 1-16-2004 Amended 9-2-2015 | Mahomet, IL 61853 | $27,990 |
95 | James L Hawks Fam Tr | Springfield, IL 62707 | $27,664 |
96 | Edward E Heinhorst Trust | Forest City, IL 61532 | $27,536 |
97 | Martha M Igoe Descendants Trust | Mahomet, IL 61853 | $27,487 |
98 | Brent Behrends | San Jose, IL 62682 | $27,368 |
99 | Van A Bitner | Mason City, IL 62664 | $27,311 |
100 | Stephen C Tracy | Mason City, IL 62664 | $26,839 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”