Total Conservation Programs in Monroe County, Illinois, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 162
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Monroe County, Illinois totaled $524,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Mark Neary | Red Bud, IL 62278 | $442 |
122 | Walter Krysnoski | Red Bud, IL 62278 | $409 |
123 | Donald L Schrader | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $356 |
124 | Scot Reime | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $350 |
125 | Paul Brinkmann | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $326 |
126 | Luke B Edler | Valmeyer, IL 62295 | $311 |
127 | Marigold Farms Inc | Red Bud, IL 62278 | $286 |
128 | Rodney Liefer | Red Bud, IL 62278 | $276 |
129 | Janice Wenk Revocable Living Trust | Saint Louis, MO 63126 | $275 |
130 | Darryl And Susan Spargo Joint Revocable Living Tru | Columbia, IL 62236 | $275 |
131 | Alberta A Matzenbacher Trust | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $265 |
132 | Brad Edler | Fults, IL 62244 | $249 |
133 | Arline W Cadwell | Chattanooga, TN 37409 | $239 |
134 | Kenneth E Wetzel Trust | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $239 |
135 | Walter Byerley Jr | Columbia, IL 62236 | $229 |
136 | Wayne N Taake | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $177 |
137 | Kloepper Hilltop Farm Trust Dated June 23, 2020 | Red Bud, IL 62278 | $177 |
138 | Glen H Mueller | Columbia, IL 62236 | $170 |
139 | Victor M Gummersheimer Farm | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $166 |
140 | Nancy Pottoff | Boulder, CO 80303 | $153 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”