Farm Subsidy information
Monroe County, Illinois
Total Subsidies in Monroe County, Illinois, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 196
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Monroe County, Illinois totaled $5,914,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Patrick Daley | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $623 |
142 | Gary Koenigstein | Red Bud, IL 62278 | $610 |
143 | Lois J Stayton Trust | Columbia, IL 62236 | $552 |
144 | Jay Vogt Revocable Living Trust | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $551 |
145 | Paul Minton - Paul R Minton Trust Dtd May 1, 2014 | Fults, IL 62244 | $550 |
146 | Charles Wallace | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $520 |
147 | Christopher G Howell | Columbia, IL 62236 | $500 |
148 | Winter Bros Material Co | Saint Louis, MO 63127 | $494 |
149 | Laverne I Schmidt 1991 Trust | Columbia, IL 62236 | $482 |
150 | Ronald Taake | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $476 |
151 | Deborah A Johns Rev Liv Tr U/t/a Dtd 9/5/00 | Saint Louis, MO 63119 | $453 |
152 | Mark Neary | Red Bud, IL 62278 | $442 |
153 | Helen Obernagel | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $429 |
154 | George W Obernagel III | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $429 |
155 | Walter Krysnoski | Red Bud, IL 62278 | $409 |
156 | Scot Reime | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $350 |
157 | Paul Brinkmann | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $326 |
158 | Luke B Edler | Valmeyer, IL 62295 | $311 |
159 | Marigold Farms Inc | Red Bud, IL 62278 | $286 |
160 | Rodney Liefer | Red Bud, IL 62278 | $276 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”