Deficiency Payment in Monroe County, Illinois, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 729
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Monroe County, Illinois totaled $1,106,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Walter E Gregson Sr | Red Bud, IL 62278 | $1,776 |
162 | Dennis Schilling | Fults, IL 62244 | $1,765 |
163 | Howard Riechmann | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $1,733 |
164 | Andrea Jenkins | Red Bud, IL 62278 | $1,731 |
165 | Ed Kueker | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $1,712 |
166 | The Scheve Corporation | Woodinville, WA 98077 | $1,701 |
167 | George A Riebeling | Valmeyer, IL 62295 | $1,698 |
168 | William F Prange | Valmeyer, IL 62295 | $1,696 |
169 | Sondag Heirs | Valmeyer, IL 62295 | $1,682 |
170 | Bernard Schilling | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $1,676 |
171 | Glenn Voelker | Fults, IL 62244 | $1,668 |
172 | Gerald Whelan | Prairie Du Rocher, IL 62277 | $1,652 |
173 | Gloria Aycock | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $1,628 |
174 | Earl Henerfauth | Prairie Du Rocher, IL 62277 | $1,601 |
175 | Donald P Weilbacher | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $1,580 |
176 | Denis Weilbacher | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $1,580 |
177 | Alberta M Rosenberg | Red Bud, IL 62278 | $1,565 |
178 | James H Vogt | Columbia, IL 62236 | $1,551 |
179 | Kevin D Cowell | Red Bud, IL 62278 | $1,537 |
180 | Alvera Niebruegge | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $1,529 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”