Farm Subsidy information
Pike County, Illinois
Total Subsidies in Pike County, Illinois, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 761
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Pike County, Illinois totaled $15,303,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Travis Ryan Puckett | Pittsfield, IL 62363 | $25,393 |
42 | Marc Lumley Farms Inc | Baylis, IL 62314 | $25,249 |
43 | Allen Fassero | Bunker Hill, IL 62014 | $25,205 |
44 | Jason L Walker | Ashland City, TN 37015 | $25,016 |
45 | Irene J Mcdowell Estate | Baylis, IL 62314 | $24,838 |
46 | Ronald L Borrowman | Nebo, IL 62355 | $24,682 |
47 | Glen Roy Pulliam II | New Canton, IL 62356 | $24,567 |
48 | Kathy Hart | Pleasant Hill, IL 62366 | $24,566 |
49 | William J Peters Living Trust | Hull, IL 62343 | $24,220 |
50 | John R Phillips Family Trust | New Berlin, IL 62670 | $24,195 |
51 | L & R Land And Cattle Company | Chambersburg, IL 62323 | $24,077 |
52 | Amy C Hoskin | Pittsfield, IL 62363 | $24,021 |
53 | Lane Wiese Family Partnership | Griggsville, IL 62340 | $23,750 |
54 | Norman L Underwood Rev Trust | Pawnee, IL 62558 | $23,576 |
55 | Sk Farming LLC | Godfrey, IL 62035 | $23,576 |
56 | Steve Rennecker | Barry, IL 62312 | $23,219 |
57 | Myrtle R Tharp | Nebo, IL 62355 | $22,883 |
58 | Dewey Farms LLC | Pleasant Hill, IL 62366 | $22,872 |
59 | M Dale Moore | Baylis, IL 62314 | $22,849 |
60 | Harley Baugher | Barry, IL 62312 | $22,655 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”