Farm Subsidy information
Pulaski County, Illinois
Total Subsidies in Pulaski County, Illinois, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 212
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Pulaski County, Illinois totaled $4,269,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Merek A Legrand | Columbia, MO 65203 | $3,346 |
102 | Perry L Woods Estate | Olmsted, IL 62970 | $3,090 |
103 | Esta Ladawn Myrick | Karnak, IL 62956 | $3,086 |
104 | David G Schnake | Carterville, IL 62918 | $2,926 |
105 | Jim Rolwing | Charleston, MO 63834 | $2,906 |
106 | Roy C Hinman Jr | Villa Ridge, IL 62996 | $2,889 |
107 | Michael Earnhart | Cypress, IL 62923 | $2,862 |
108 | Russell E Frizzell | Ullin, IL 62992 | $2,696 |
109 | Bill Seiler Farms Inc | Jackson, MO 63755 | $2,435 |
110 | Richard Mcmunn Testamentary Family Trust | Villa Ridge, IL 62996 | $2,426 |
111 | Billy D Dover Jr | Grand Chain, IL 62941 | $2,289 |
112 | Nancy E Lance | Olmsted, IL 62970 | $2,230 |
113 | David L Watson | Grand Chain, IL 62941 | $2,180 |
114 | Mildred R Henderson | Olmsted, IL 62970 | $2,144 |
115 | Matthew Rodney Britt | Grand Chain, IL 62941 | $2,073 |
116 | Eugene V Dennis | Olmsted, IL 62970 | $2,013 |
117 | Rex Wilburn | Pulaski, IL 62976 | $2,011 |
118 | Eric D Hargan | Arlington, VA 22207 | $1,898 |
119 | Chad P Douglas | Karnak, IL 62956 | $1,877 |
120 | Gary Lefevre | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $1,863 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”