Farm Subsidy information
Pulaski County, Illinois
Total Subsidies in Pulaski County, Illinois, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 113
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Pulaski County, Illinois totaled $3,097,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Deer Hollow Farms Inc | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $50,000 |
2 | Hashood Farms Inc | Scottsdale, AZ 85262 | $46,799 |
3 | Miles Adkins | Ullin, IL 62992 | $32,466 |
4 | , | $28,954 | |
5 | Sarah H Obrien | Hilton Head Island, SC 29928 | $28,932 |
6 | Taake Farms | Ullin, IL 62992 | $25,827 |
7 | Boar Creek Valley Farms LLC | Villa Ridge, IL 62996 | $23,077 |
8 | L & E Wilson Family Limited Partnership | Rushville, IL 62681 | $19,899 |
9 | Darrell G Miller | Dongola, IL 62926 | $17,214 |
10 | , | $16,480 | |
11 | Sue A Mcintosh | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $14,789 |
12 | Britt Family Farms LLC | Charlottesville, VA 22911 | $14,444 |
13 | Kevin Ulrich | Grand Chain, IL 62941 | $13,444 |
14 | Ulen Farms | Ullin, IL 62992 | $13,430 |
15 | Dennis Clark | Karnak, IL 62956 | $12,706 |
16 | Robert E Defield | Marathon, FL 33050 | $12,513 |
17 | Gerald P Thurston | Pulaski, IL 62976 | $12,441 |
18 | Skip And Jerrys Farm LLC | Elizabethtown, PA 17022 | $10,682 |
19 | Robert A Reichert | Grand Chain, IL 62941 | $9,516 |
20 | Long Reach 101 Revocable Living Trust | Grand Chain, IL 62941 | $9,170 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>