Conservation Reserve Program in Richland County, Illinois, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,333
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Richland County, Illinois totaled $29,180,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Gray Farms Inc | Claremont, IL 62421 | $86,742 |
82 | Robert L Steber And Loretta B Ste | Claremont, IL 62421 | $85,797 |
83 | Vanblaricum Farms Inc | Noble, IL 62868 | $85,029 |
84 | Elmer B Eckel Trust | Kinmundy, IL 62854 | $83,954 |
85 | George Snider | Dundas, IL 62425 | $82,879 |
86 | Kenneth M Weiler | Claremont, IL 62421 | $82,603 |
87 | Kent Marks | West Salem, IL 62476 | $81,838 |
88 | Kenneth R Taylor | Olney, IL 62450 | $79,248 |
89 | William L Taylor | Fairfield, IL 62837 | $79,247 |
90 | Robert L Crum Revocable Trust | Olney, IL 62450 | $77,904 |
91 | Galen Leon Hinkel | Dundas, IL 62425 | $77,832 |
92 | Urfer & Co Inc | Olney, IL 62450 | $77,208 |
93 | Dennis Anderson | Noble, IL 62868 | $77,134 |
94 | Carrel B Mayfield Trust | Olney, IL 62450 | $74,848 |
95 | Dean Ginder | Claremont, IL 62421 | $73,992 |
96 | Ronald E Waldrop | Olney, IL 62450 | $72,890 |
97 | Verneatha Kessler | Noble, IL 62868 | $72,859 |
98 | Beyler Family Trust | Murphysboro, IL 62966 | $71,979 |
99 | Paul William Kocher | Claremont, IL 62421 | $71,932 |
100 | Collins Stoll | Olney, IL 62450 | $71,611 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”