Total Conservation Programs in Saline County, Illinois, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 201
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Saline County, Illinois totaled $743,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Clarence Edward Etienne Jr Trust | Eldorado, IL 62930 | $3,854 |
62 | Mary Ellen Dillon Revocable Trust-mary Ellen Dillo | Galatia, IL 62935 | $3,768 |
63 | F & S Farms | Rock Hill, SC 29730 | $3,759 |
64 | Wilma Sue Patterson | Galatia, IL 62935 | $3,466 |
65 | John P Mitchell | Raleigh, IL 62977 | $3,366 |
66 | John R Williams | Belleville, IL 62221 | $3,344 |
67 | Michael Wayne Roberts | Eldorado, IL 62930 | $3,322 |
68 | Guy Tanner Farms | Eureka Springs, AR 72632 | $3,244 |
69 | Mark A Etienne - Mark A Etienne Trust | Eldorado, IL 62930 | $3,116 |
70 | The Regina C Cowsert Living Revocable Trust - Regi | Harrisburg, IL 62946 | $3,038 |
71 | Lisa Ann Rhine | Raleigh, IL 62977 | $3,030 |
72 | Loy Neal Sr And Loretta S Patterson Irrv Tr | Galatia, IL 62935 | $3,000 |
73 | Joe Bob Irwin And Janet L Irwin Revocable Trust | Harrisburg, IL 62946 | $2,820 |
74 | Anita J Lovellette | Harrisburg, IL 62946 | $2,745 |
75 | William I Patterson | Pinckneyville, IL 62274 | $2,660 |
76 | , | $2,653 | |
77 | Grant F Apgar | Barnegat, NJ 08005 | $2,608 |
78 | , | $2,473 | |
79 | , | $2,473 | |
80 | Paula Sweat | Harrisburg, IL 62946 | $2,433 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”