Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Sangamon County, Illinois, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 78
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Sangamon County, Illinois totaled $213,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | R P Minder Sr | Loami, IL 62661 | $3,484 |
22 | Bomke Farms | Pleasant Plains, IL 62677 | $3,394 |
23 | Tri-d Inc | Auburn, IL 62615 | $3,364 |
24 | John H Irwin March 1991 Irr Trust | Chicago, IL 60618 | $3,284 |
25 | Daniel Boston | Pawnee, IL 62558 | $3,280 |
26 | Bergschneider Stock Farm | New Berlin, IL 62670 | $3,268 |
27 | Phillip Taft | Dawson, IL 62520 | $3,032 |
28 | Edna F Matthews | Dawson, IL 62520 | $3,028 |
29 | D & C Fowler Farms Inc | Sherman, IL 62684 | $2,984 |
30 | Isaac E Dodd Revocable Trust | Loami, IL 62661 | $2,564 |
31 | Dean A Dickey | Rochester, IL 62563 | $2,292 |
32 | J & W Farms LLC | Sherman, IL 62684 | $2,192 |
33 | Stanley E Lederbrand | Pawnee, IL 62558 | $2,156 |
34 | Greg A Schemmer | Williamsville, IL 62693 | $2,152 |
35 | Leahy James Bennett | Pleasant Plains, IL 62677 | $2,120 |
36 | Dennis W Ayers | Rochester, IL 62563 | $2,116 |
37 | F Otto Rentschler | Dawson, IL 62520 | $1,988 |
38 | Joel B Muench | New Berlin, IL 62670 | $1,720 |
39 | Bruce Workman | New Berlin, IL 62670 | $1,716 |
40 | Dwain Steinhour | Petersburg, IL 62675 | $1,708 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”