Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Sangamon County, Illinois, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 903
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Sangamon County, Illinois totaled $7,252,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Ted C Megginson | Auburn, IL 62615 | $34,146 |
42 | John W Leka Farms Inc | Illiopolis, IL 62539 | $33,185 |
43 | Bruce L Constant | Sherman, IL 62684 | $33,120 |
44 | Paluska Farms Inc | Waverly, IL 62692 | $32,972 |
45 | Douglas J Schemmer | Chatham, IL 62629 | $32,716 |
46 | D & S Farms Inc | Pawnee, IL 62558 | $32,209 |
47 | James Robert Heissinger | Rochester, IL 62563 | $32,112 |
48 | Boesdorfer & Boesdorfer Inc | Auburn, IL 62615 | $32,055 |
49 | D Dowson Fms II LLC | Pawnee, IL 62558 | $31,849 |
50 | Fry Farms Inc | Pawnee, IL 62558 | $31,849 |
51 | Leahy James Bennett | Pleasant Plains, IL 62677 | $31,607 |
52 | John S Ayers | Rochester, IL 62563 | $30,779 |
53 | Roger Dudley | Pleasant Plains, IL 62677 | $30,593 |
54 | Frederick B Fleck Estate | Riverton, IL 62561 | $30,458 |
55 | John M Megginson | Auburn, IL 62615 | $30,338 |
56 | Ostermeier Farms LLC | Pawnee, IL 62558 | $29,386 |
57 | William Clayton Sandidge | Loami, IL 62661 | $29,160 |
58 | Austen Caleb Etherton | Dawson, IL 62520 | $29,036 |
59 | Gregory E Marshall | Buffalo, IL 62515 | $27,959 |
60 | Roger Kevin Pfeiffer | Dawson, IL 62520 | $27,919 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”