Total Emergency Relief Program in Wabash County, Illinois, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 40
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Wabash County, Illinois totaled $734,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Bates Brothers LLC | Allendale, IL 62410 | $138,438 |
2 | Matthew Hocking | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $124,361 |
3 | Level Acres Inc | West Salem, IL 62476 | $104,717 |
4 | Larry G Hocking & Sons LLC | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $80,408 |
5 | L Todd Hocking | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $69,720 |
6 | Edward Riggs | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $22,602 |
7 | Hill View Farms Inc | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $17,404 |
8 | Allen E Broster | West Salem, IL 62476 | $13,997 |
9 | Donald Schonaman | Browns, IL 62818 | $11,924 |
10 | Tennis Dairy LLC | Browns, IL 62818 | $11,589 |
11 | Highland Farms Inc | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $11,198 |
12 | Debra J Broster | West Salem, IL 62476 | $11,105 |
13 | Dianne Kennard Farms LLC | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $10,475 |
14 | Larry D Seals | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $9,851 |
15 | Kent E Broster | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $7,394 |
16 | Chad A Broster | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $7,239 |
17 | Tennis Dairy Farms Lp | Browns, IL 62818 | $6,986 |
18 | Ryan A Peter | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $5,498 |
19 | Jamie L Mccorkle | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $5,293 |
20 | Kurt Duane Broster | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $4,985 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>