Farm Subsidy information
Wayne County, Illinois
Total Subsidies in Wayne County, Illinois, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 954
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Wayne County, Illinois totaled $26,131,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Ricketts So Il Gp | Fairfield, IL 62837 | $47,361 |
22 | Kristi Woodrow | Enfield, IL 62835 | $46,723 |
23 | Daniel Coy | Dahlgren, IL 62828 | $46,154 |
24 | Jasen Ray Tubbs | Wayne City, IL 62895 | $46,027 |
25 | Bunnage Farms Inc | Golden Gate, IL 62843 | $43,132 |
26 | Kent Woodrow | Enfield, IL 62835 | $38,542 |
27 | Mark Manda & Madeline Manda Legrand Rvoc Grantors | Wheeling, IL 60090 | $37,562 |
28 | Roettger Electric Co Inc | Evansville, IN 47725 | $36,502 |
29 | Mary E Bradford Revocable Trust | Keenes, IL 62851 | $36,483 |
30 | Smith Farms LLC | Cisne, IL 62823 | $34,836 |
31 | Frey Brothers | Keenes, IL 62851 | $34,636 |
32 | Schwartz Acres LLC | Johnsonville, IL 62850 | $33,684 |
33 | D C Farms | Springerton, IL 62887 | $32,140 |
34 | James Randall Hedrick | Mount Erie, IL 62446 | $31,685 |
35 | Chris Massie | Mount Erie, IL 62446 | $31,485 |
36 | Jarod Weaver | Fairfield, IL 62837 | $31,244 |
37 | Justin Atwood | Fairfield, IL 62837 | $31,026 |
38 | Kendall E Meritt | Wayne City, IL 62895 | $30,458 |
39 | Sgb Farms Inc | Albers, IL 62215 | $30,132 |
40 | James V Hoeszle | West Salem, IL 62476 | $28,510 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”