Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 39,613
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Indiana totaled $1,309,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Kline Family Farms Partnership | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $814,020 |
22 | Bowman Farms | La Fontaine, IN 46940 | $800,382 |
23 | J&t Laidig Farms Partnership | Bremen, IN 46506 | $794,204 |
24 | Smith Family Farms Gp | Rochester, IN 46975 | $790,114 |
25 | Maple Farms Gp | Kokomo, IN 46902 | $774,233 |
26 | Geswein Farms Gp | Westpoint, IN 47992 | $768,130 |
27 | Rose Brothers Farms | Rockville, IN 47872 | $753,930 |
28 | Ag Production Ent Inc | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $750,000 |
29 | Oakdale Partners | Jasper, IN 47546 | $735,367 |
30 | Hageman Farms Partnership | Remington, IN 47977 | $718,063 |
31 | Moon Island Farms Partnership | Lowell, IN 46356 | $717,664 |
32 | Neese Farms | Frankton, IN 46044 | $706,925 |
33 | Gudeman Ag | Francesville, IN 47946 | $706,465 |
34 | Osborn Farm Partnership | Clarks Hill, IN 47930 | $701,614 |
35 | Ams Farms | Monroe City, IN 47557 | $699,126 |
36 | L&h Wischmeier General Partnership | Columbus, IN 47201 | $698,560 |
37 | I & S Furrer Farms Inc | Wolcott, IN 47995 | $690,426 |
38 | Lee Farms | Salem, IN 47167 | $689,987 |
39 | Ames 4k Farms | Fillmore, IN 46128 | $688,049 |
40 | Suiter Farms Partnership | Earl Park, IN 47942 | $684,391 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”