Total Pandemic Assistance Program (PARP) in Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 626
Recipients of Total Pandemic Assistance Program (PARP) from farms in Indiana totaled $4,240,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Pandemic Assistance Program (PARP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Fred Timothy & Susan Jane Alexander Rlt | Winamac, IN 46996 | $11,875 |
22 | Timothy R Mosbey | Chandler, IN 47610 | $11,875 |
23 | Timothy Rorick | New Haven, IN 46774 | $11,875 |
24 | Jason E Carlson | Attica, IN 47918 | $11,875 |
25 | Diener Bros Inc | Reynolds, IN 47980 | $11,875 |
26 | Dekock Feedlot Inc | Fair Oaks, IN 47943 | $11,875 |
27 | Huseman Farm Inc | Cedar Lake, IN 46303 | $11,875 |
28 | De Sutter Farms Inc | Attica, IN 47918 | $11,875 |
29 | Ryan Brothers Livestock LLC | Bloomington, IN 47408 | $11,875 |
30 | Sipkema Farms Inc | Demotte, IN 46310 | $11,875 |
31 | Swartzentruber Farms Inc | Odon, IN 47562 | $11,875 |
32 | P & M Gordon Farms Inc | Rushville, IN 46173 | $11,875 |
33 | E & D Gordon Farms Inc | Rushville, IN 46173 | $11,875 |
34 | Dennis Stoller Farms Inc | Remington, IN 47977 | $11,875 |
35 | Ag Innovations Inc | Hartsville, IN 47244 | $11,875 |
36 | D & D Farms Inc | Kentland, IN 47951 | $11,875 |
37 | Streitmatter Farms Inc | Rensselaer, IN 47978 | $11,875 |
38 | Jeff Green | Rensselaer, IN 47978 | $11,875 |
39 | Craig D Gillis | Dunkirk, IN 47336 | $11,875 |
40 | Chad Widmer | West Lafayette, IN 47906 | $11,875 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”