Total Conservation Programs in Indiana, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 15,222
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Indiana totaled $42,009,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Jerry Quick | Gosport, IN 47433 | $41,858 |
62 | Peggy Ann Ehlers Revocable Trust | Versailles, IN 47042 | $41,285 |
63 | Christian A Rudolph | Petersburg, IN 47567 | $41,260 |
64 | R L Zollman Inc | Medora, IN 47260 | $41,000 |
65 | , | $40,968 | |
66 | Tom-thomas W Christman Living Trust Christman | Wabash, IN 46992 | $40,802 |
67 | Central Indiana Land Trust Inc | Indianapolis, IN 46202 | $40,397 |
68 | Robert H Mulford | Versailles, IN 47042 | $40,298 |
69 | Anthony Rust Living Trust | Brownstown, IN 47220 | $40,250 |
70 | , | $39,440 | |
71 | James Hallar | Monticello, IN 47960 | $39,237 |
72 | Carter Farms Inc | Lewis, IN 47858 | $39,132 |
73 | Cain's Homelike Farms Inc | Darlington, IN 47940 | $39,036 |
74 | Barbara L Boerger Irrv Trust | Auburn, IN 46706 | $38,840 |
75 | Amy Rudolph | Petersburg, IN 47567 | $38,800 |
76 | Don Blanch- Don & Kathy Blanch Jt Rev Trust | Michigantown, IN 46057 | $38,043 |
77 | James Steven Mcintosh | Williamsport, IN 47993 | $37,833 |
78 | Dr Henry J Matick | Vincennes, IN 47591 | $37,780 |
79 | , | $37,689 | |
80 | Robert Coffin | Knox, IN 46534 | $37,517 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”