Conservation Reserve Program in Indiana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 15,995
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Indiana totaled $42,077,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Erwin Family Limited Partnership | Peru, IN 46970 | $38,368 |
82 | Don Blanch- Don & Kathy Blanch Jt Rev Trust | Michigantown, IN 46057 | $38,043 |
83 | James Steven Mcintosh | Williamsport, IN 47993 | $37,833 |
84 | Southern Whitewater Valley Land Trust | Centerville, IN 47330 | $37,593 |
85 | John Abbring | Wheatfield, IN 46392 | $37,354 |
86 | Joseph T Janas | La Porte, IN 46350 | $36,932 |
87 | Matthew D Lark | Loogootee, IN 47553 | $36,687 |
88 | Lynn K Finkel-finkel-kelleghan Family Trust | Jackson, WY 83002 | $36,294 |
89 | , | $36,239 | |
90 | Larry G Porter | Worthington, IN 47471 | $35,628 |
91 | , | $34,869 | |
92 | Marshall Management LLC | Orleans, IN 47452 | $34,165 |
93 | Fred Abbring | Wheatfield, IN 46392 | $34,159 |
94 | Iva L Johnson Trust | Roachdale, IN 46172 | $34,014 |
95 | Strain Farms Inc | Farmersburg, IN 47850 | $33,728 |
96 | Patoka Valley Conservation Partners LLC | Newburgh, IN 47630 | $33,468 |
97 | Scott A Wuethrich | Francesville, IN 47946 | $33,376 |
98 | Thomas W Christman Irr Trust | Anderson, IN 46011 | $33,367 |
99 | Hill Farms Inc | Medora, IN 47260 | $33,096 |
100 | Daniel Ransom | Fowler, IN 47944 | $33,065 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”