Farm Subsidy information
Indiana
Total Subsidies in Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 175,254
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Indiana totaled $17,457,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | A Plus Farms | Pine Village, IN 47975 | $2,849,563 |
102 | Harold C Bender Farm | Poseyville, IN 47633 | $2,847,798 |
103 | Dean Ford | Dupont, IN 47231 | $2,844,540 |
104 | D & G Farms | Dunkirk, IN 47336 | $2,844,363 |
105 | Ault Farms Inc | Rochester, IN 46975 | $2,841,714 |
106 | Wise Farm Management Corp | Delphi, IN 46923 | $2,809,453 |
107 | Kohlhagen Farms | Rensselaer, IN 47978 | $2,804,300 |
108 | Scott Farms Family Partnership | Greenfield, IN 46140 | $2,795,931 |
109 | Jackson Farms | Lebanon, IN 46052 | $2,773,851 |
110 | Merlin Martin | Clayton, IN 46118 | $2,767,695 |
111 | Ams Farms | Monroe City, IN 47557 | $2,752,761 |
112 | Jd Seed Farms General Partnership | Topeka, IN 46571 | $2,718,690 |
113 | Dmh Family Farms | Portland, IN 47371 | $2,701,515 |
114 | Hill Farms Inc | Medora, IN 47260 | $2,701,008 |
115 | Cochenour Farms | Lamar, IN 47550 | $2,697,049 |
116 | Cypress Farms | Bruceville, IN 47516 | $2,690,531 |
117 | John Strouse | Spencer, IN 47460 | $2,680,887 |
118 | Walker Farms Gp | Waterloo, IN 46793 | $2,665,392 |
119 | Thomas C Stewart,james G Stewart & Stephen G Gunn | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $2,652,466 |
120 | Stevenson Farms | Brazil, IN 47834 | $2,629,116 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”