Farm Subsidy information
Indiana
Total Subsidies in Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 175,254
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Indiana totaled $17,457,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | South View Farms Inc | Claypool, IN 46510 | $2,621,574 |
122 | Churchill Farms | Lake Village, IN 46349 | $2,608,429 |
123 | Ja Wise Farms Inc | Delphi, IN 46923 | $2,603,116 |
124 | Ron Coffman | Liberty, IN 47353 | $2,599,129 |
125 | Hudson Farms Inc | Roann, IN 46974 | $2,581,116 |
126 | Hageman Farms Partnership | Remington, IN 47977 | $2,568,303 |
127 | Jaro Farms | Crawfordsville, IN 47933 | $2,567,838 |
128 | Ssz Enterprises LLC | Greenfield, IN 46140 | $2,564,184 |
129 | Mark L Deardorff | Macy, IN 46951 | $2,546,689 |
130 | Hostetter Brothers | Lyons, IN 47443 | $2,533,885 |
131 | Clauson Farms | Rochester, IN 46975 | $2,526,785 |
132 | L&h Wischmeier General Partnership | Columbus, IN 47201 | $2,510,546 |
133 | Hale Farms %robert Hale | Waveland, IN 47989 | $2,501,083 |
134 | Indy Family Farms | Greenwood, IN 46142 | $2,500,045 |
135 | Cloverleaf Farms | West Lebanon, IN 47991 | $2,474,204 |
136 | Gene Hirsch Farms Inc | Cynthiana, IN 47612 | $2,470,538 |
137 | Small Grain Farms Gp | Monroe City, IN 47557 | $2,470,289 |
138 | Sommer Farms Inc | Berne, IN 46711 | $2,468,720 |
139 | Ertel Farms Inc | Osgood, IN 47037 | $2,463,906 |
140 | Yoder Farms | Elnora, IN 47529 | $2,453,736 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”