Emergency Conservation Program in Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 1,271
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Indiana totaled $7,203,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Bruce Wm Morris | Franklin, IN 46131 | $10,825 |
142 | Greenwood Farms C/o J Newton | Indianapolis, IN 46220 | $10,797 |
143 | Ronald Small | Monroe City, IN 47557 | $10,780 |
144 | A & M Farms General Partnership | Fountaintown, IN 46130 | $10,664 |
145 | Adam Dobson | Cloverdale, IN 46120 | $10,653 |
146 | Mildred Devillez | Tell City, IN 47586 | $10,528 |
147 | Memering Farms | Washington, IN 47501 | $10,500 |
148 | William Casey | Franklin, IN 46131 | $10,441 |
149 | Shady Lane Farms | South Bend, IN 46619 | $10,349 |
150 | Steve Myers | Washington, IN 47501 | $10,320 |
151 | Edward Huffmeyer | Greensburg, IN 47240 | $10,288 |
152 | Donald Lane | Pekin, IN 47165 | $10,287 |
153 | Melvin N Fredbeck | Franklin, IN 46131 | $10,275 |
154 | Franklin Torr Inc | Greencastle, IN 46135 | $10,151 |
155 | Scott Johnson | Fairbanks, IN 47849 | $10,144 |
156 | Switzer Farms | Williamsport, IN 47993 | $10,115 |
157 | William J Ferree | Sullivan, IN 47882 | $10,088 |
158 | David R Wesner | Vallonia, IN 47281 | $10,012 |
159 | Marshall Milhon | Martinsville, IN 46151 | $10,000 |
160 | Jack L Ross Jr | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $9,952 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”